Need response to week 2 discussion

Stuck with a Question?

Get it solved from our top experts within 8 hrs!

Ask Your Question Now!

Please based on the information you gave in week 2 discussion, the instructor wants this information. Please could you respond ASAP. The instructor’s question is : Specifically, how many research scientists, what is their background and how many lay people and what is their background? Your information is quite general. Below was what you wrote: The Research Ethics Committee The course is very educative and enlightening. It gives insight to the learner about the actual responsibilities of the Research Ethics committee. Also, the learner can get detailed guidelines offered by the council in a given medical facility. I work in one of the acute care facilities in the downtown of history, and in this facility, the research process that involves human participants is conducted in several ways by the REC that has been established in the institution (Humphreys, 2016). The committee holds meetings frequently and may call upon some researchers to attend these meetings which provide their research procedures to them. In some cases, the board carries out some interviews with human participants to get the required information. The said Committee then reviews every single proposal on human subjects ensuring that all participants are protected regarding safety and their welfare (Humphreys, 2016). Before subject recruitment and information gathering at the St Joseph Centre, all the subject researches are reviewed and approved by the IRB. The REC in the facility is composed of several scientists and some lay members who do the reviewing of the frequent activities of the institution. It is essential that the lay persons are available to be able to offer more information about the concerns of the society and deliver their opinions on the issue in discussion (Humphreys, 2016). The members of the Research Ethics Committee at St Joseph’s Medical Centre do meet according to the required Federal Guidelines because they can review the proposals brought before them on time. Also, with regards to the issues raised, they can ensure reduction of the risks that the participants are exposed to (Humphreys, 2016). Equally, they make sure that the participants’ benefits are well distributed. Through them, the privacy of participants is provided, and the required information is obtained. References Humphreys, S. (2016). Research ethics committees: The ineligibles. Research Ethics, 174701611246697.